[frmmodal-content label="50 State Probate Guide"][formidable id=47 minimize = "1"][/frmmodal-content]

Abuse of Discretion to Award Attorneys’ Fees in Guardianship Action Absent A Finding of Bad Faith Conduct

By:  Jeffrey Skatoff, Esq.

A Court has the inherent authority to award attorneys’ fees and costs as a sanction against a litigant.  However, a court that chooses to award fees as a sanction in a Florida guardianship must make an express finding of bad faith conduct.

Express Findings and Due Process Required To Award Guardianship Attorneys Fees As Sanction

The Third District, in Goldman v. EO Goldman 3D14-0098 (Fla. 3d DCA June 17, 2015), reversed an award of attorneys’ fees as a sanction in a Florida guardianship action because the trial court abused its discretion in granting the award without an express finding of bad faith conduct. 

The express finding “must be supported by detailed factual findings describing the specific acts of bad faith conduct that resulted in the unnecessary incurrence of attorneys’ fees.” Id. (quoting Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So. 2d 221, 227 (Fla. 2002)). Under the Supreme Court’s framework outlined in Moakley, the amount of the attorneys’ fees award must be directly related to the attorneys’ fees and costs the adversary has incurred as a result of the “specific bad faith conduct of the attorney” and requires notice as well as an opportunity to be heard.  Id.

Inadvertent Mistake Does Not Equal Bad Faith

In Goldman, the court-appointed Guardian Ad Litem for Aaron Goldman in his guardianship proceedings provided confidential materials, including medical and financial records, in the guardianship file to the opposing party.  The trial court held a hearing regarding sanctions and found that the attorney sent the file inadvertently and not in bad faith.  The inadvertent and accidental disclosure of the confidential file was not intentional. 

Specific Findings Regarding Bad Faith Required

The trial court failed to make specific findings regarding the bad faith conduct as to each party and/or attorney.  Failure by the trial court to do so in its impositions of sanctions required reversal. The Court relied on T/F Systems, Inc. v. Malt, which interpreted Moakley, to hold that the procedures for imposing a sanction award of attorneys’ fees are equally applicable as to an attorney or a party.  814 So. 2d 511, 513 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). Therefore, where the guardianship trial court failed to make a specific finding regarding bad faith conduct as to each party or attorney, reversal of the fees award was required by the Third District. 

Jeffrey Skatoff is a Florida probate attorney.  To have Mr. Skatoff review your case free of charge, please go to his website.

Jeffrey Skatoff Esq

Jeffrey H. Skatoff, Esq.

Probate, Trust & Guardianship Litigation

Hourly & Contingency Fees Available

AV Rated Martindale Hubbell

skatoff.com 

(561) 842-4868

Complete Guide to Florida Probate

Opening the Probate Estate / Initial Steps
Payment of Creditors, Expenses And Beneficiaries
Florida Spousal and Family Rights
beneficiary witness will Oklahoma
Closing the Probate Estate
Probate Litigation and Will Contests
Florida Probate Quick Guides

Jeffrey Skatoff’s

Complete Guide to Florida Probate

Opening the Probate Estate - Initial Steps
Payment of Creditors, Expenses And Beneficiaries
Florida Spousal and Family Rights